BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Opus Kinetic - ECPv6.15.12.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.opuskinetic.com X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Opus Kinetic REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Asia/Singapore BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 TZNAME:+08 DTSTART:20170101T000000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180905 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20180908 DTSTAMP:20260509T153008 CREATED:20180904T062122Z LAST-MODIFIED:20190221T074636Z UID:10000534-1536105600-1536364799@www.opuskinetic.com SUMMARY:ALARP Principles & Guidelines DESCRIPTION:Overview\nRisk reduction measures are required to be demonstrated in Safety Case as per Singapore WSH (MHI) Regulations. One of the key components of Safety Case is to demonstrate risk reduction to As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) level by adopting and implementing control measures. Therefore\, there is a need to understand the use of these principles with respect to the level of uncertainty and on the risk criteria. In this case-study led workshop\, delegates will be taught on the key concepts\, and approaches taken to demonstrate or provide evidence on ALARP. \nThis course covers the important principles of ALARP. It discusses the variability of ALARP requirements for managing similar hazards in different circumstances and the application of risk targets. It looks at different ways of assessing risk from quantified approaches to qualitative approaches for both consequence and frequency analysis and when to use these. The application of inherent safety principles and recognised good practice are discussed along with Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) and the concepts of reasonably practicable and disproportionality. Besides demonstrating ALARP in the Safety Case\, ALARP should be applied throughout the life cycle of any facility. \nThis workshop will touch on how to apply the concept in different situations such as during design\, specifying instrumented safety systems\, operating procedures\, and coverage during maintenance of safety critical equipment. Several case studies are presented for the delegates to work through and a discussion on common errors and how the concept is often misused. Throughout this workshop\, participants will be taught on how to prove that ALARP has been properly implemented as part of effective risk management and how ALARP is implemented in the design\, development\, and operation of engineering systems. \nWho Should Attend\nEngineers\, Executives\, Supervisors\, and Managers especially those who work in Technical & Planning\, Production/Operation\, Engineering\, and SHE departments in Refinery\, Chemicals\, and Petrochemical settings will benefit by attending this course.\nPotential attendees are: \n\nProcess Engineer\nProcess Champion\nEHS Engineer\nProduction Engineer\nProduction Supervisor\nMaintenance Engineer\nOperations Engineer\nMechanical Engineer\nPiping Engineer\nProduction Manager\nTechnical Manager\nTechnical Development Manager\n\nKey Learning Points\n\nLearn the essential principles of ALARP and how it fits within a Safety Case\nGain the key concepts of ALARP principles and the fundamental approaches for its applications\nKnow the HSE principles for CBA in support of ALARP decisions\nUnderstand the approaches to good practice and to demonstrate ALARP using different decision making criteria\nAcquire tools and techniques to determine factors in selecting or rejecting control measures\nWith each process deviation\, apply the concept of ALARP or risk elimination on the causes and consequences\nBecome familiar with PHA study\, its context in WSH Act and its relation in Safety Case regime\nExercise caution in regards to reverse ALARP whereby CBA or QRA is used to justify higher risk\n\nEnquiry Form\n\n\n \n \n SalutationMr.Miss.Mrs.Mdm.Dr.Prof.Capt.Name\n \n \n \n First\n \n \n \n \n Last\n \n \n PhoneEmail\n \n CompanyAdditional Comments:CAPTCHA URL:https://www.opuskinetic.com/training/alarp-principles-guidelines-8/ LOCATION:Kuala Lumpur\, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur\, Kuala Lumpur\, Malaysia CATEGORIES:Corporate, Business Management and HR,Downstream,Oil/Gas/Petrochemicals GEO:3.1384965;101.7099933 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180906 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20180908 DTSTAMP:20260509T153008 CREATED:20180518T043505Z LAST-MODIFIED:20180518T043505Z UID:10000284-1536192000-1536364799@www.opuskinetic.com SUMMARY:The 21st Century Credit Manager – The Changing Role in a New Era DESCRIPTION:Overview\nThis workshop is designed and developed with current issues and challenges faced by collection managers and supervisors in handling accounts and portfolio management in mind. Delegates will capitalise on expert knowledge and experience in leadership and the various management style; building\, cultivating and mentoring teams; setting up targets and improving team performance which will result in a better performing portfolio. The programme also includes Best Practice standards for the Credit and Collections profession so that you can use them as a measure for your own organisation’s performance.  \nWho Should Attend\nThis workshop is designed for professionals and executives who have stakes/roles in : \n\nCollections and credit control management\nDebt recovery/collections\nAccounts receivables\nPayments and settlements\nFinance\nBilling\nCredit management\nCall centre/contact centre\nSales and marketing\n\nKey Learning Objectives\n\nEnhance leadership and explore various management styles\nLearn & Practice on how to build\, nurture\, mentor and motivate teams\nMeet targets and improve portfolio performance\nUnderstand the importance of incentives and how to motivate and improve team performance\nRecognise the different characters of each team member\nUnderstand team dynamics and how it affects team performance\nKnow when and how to be assertive at workplace\nApply selective tactics on managing teams and exerting influence\n\nEnquiry Form\n\n \n \n SalutationMr.Miss.Mrs.Mdm.Dr.Prof.Capt.Name\n \n \n \n First\n \n \n \n \n Last\n \n \n PhoneEmail\n \n CompanyAdditional Comments:CAPTCHA URL:https://www.opuskinetic.com/training/the-21st-century-credit-manager-the-changing-role-in-a-new-era-2/ LOCATION:Singapore\, Singapore CATEGORIES:Banking and Finance,Corporate, Business Management and HR GEO:1.352083;103.819836 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180910 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20180913 DTSTAMP:20260509T153008 CREATED:20180517T045804Z LAST-MODIFIED:20180517T045804Z UID:10000273-1536537600-1536796799@www.opuskinetic.com SUMMARY:Project Scheduling & Risk DESCRIPTION:Overview\nAll projects need to be planned\, and the project Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule is the most powerful asset in the project planner’s toolset to plan the project\, forecast the project’s key dates and manage the resources assigned. Yet from reviewing many project schedules of oil & gas and construction projects in the commercial sector and in government agency projects such as aerospace\, software and construction we see a wide variation in the capability of the schedulers to put together\, and of management to understand the project schedule. \n\nThis workshop presents the best practices in project scheduling as simply as possible and explains why following them gets the best result. We discuss the key concept of understanding the schedule as a dynamic tool for project management versus a list of dates\, some of which are often imposed on the project from the outside. Still\, projects often overrun their schedules. We may overrun schedules because the schedule is not the idealized perfect schedule but is influenced by forces that lead to an infeasible plan from the beginning. \n\nA main reason that we overrun project schedules is that risk from many sources tends to make the work take longer than planned or add work not in the baseline schedule. Identifying risks and estimating their probability and impact on the schedule will accomplish two key goals: (1) developing a realistic view of when the project finishes following the current plan\, and (2) identifying the key risk drivers for risk mitigation and hence better project performance. \n\nOrganizations are increasingly requiring schedule risk analysis in advance of key decision points to make sure they have a realistic view of their project’s timeline. They realize there is something beyond the static CPM schedule. Building on a well-structured schedule\, risk analysis provides a view of the project’s timeline in an uncertain world\, very common in oil and gas projects. We will discuss experience with offshore installations\, refinery and other on-shore facilities and pipelines during this course. \nWho Should Attend\nDirectors\, Managers\, Engineers\, Heads of: \n\nPlanning & Scheduling\nProjects\nCost Control\n\nKey Learning Objectives\n\nLEARN what to expect from your Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule\nUNDERSTAND the common errors in project scheduling and how to avoid or fix them\nMASTER the basics of project scheduling and progress to advanced concepts\nIDENTIFY and deal with the common cultural and individual biases in scheduling\nFIND OUT the 10 Best Practices of project scheduling\nDISCOVER the limitations of static CPM scheduling and why believing in the schedule can lead to trouble\nEXAMINE why Schedule Risk Analysis adds to your understanding of the project’s timeline\nKNOW how to identify risks to the project schedule\nANALYZE how the corporate culture makes it diffcult to address schedule risk directly\nLEARN what should we tell the customer or other stakeholders about the project’s completion date\nGAIN INSIGHT on how do we estimate an appropriate schedule contingency reserve of time\n\nEnquiry Form\n\n \n \n SalutationMr.Miss.Mrs.Mdm.Dr.Prof.Capt.Name\n \n \n \n First\n \n \n \n \n Last\n \n \n PhoneEmail\n \n CompanyAdditional Comments:CAPTCHA URL:https://www.opuskinetic.com/training/project-scheduling-risk/ LOCATION:Bangkok\, Thailand CATEGORIES:Corporate, Business Management and HR GEO:15.870032;100.992541 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180924 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20180926 DTSTAMP:20260509T153008 CREATED:20180517T075148Z LAST-MODIFIED:20180517T075148Z UID:10000280-1537747200-1537919999@www.opuskinetic.com SUMMARY:ALARP Principles & Guidelines DESCRIPTION:Overview\nOne of the key components of Safety Case is to demonstrate risk reduction to ALARP level by adopting and implementing control measures. Therefore\, there is a need to understand the use of these principles with respect to the level of uncertainty and on the risk criteria. \nIn this case-study led workshop\, delegates will be taught on the key concepts\, and approaches taken to demonstrate or provide evidence on ALARP. The idea behind ALARP is to demonstrate risk reductions in MHI based on reasonable practicability and gross disproportion\, which is a balancing act between cost and risk. As far as the application of numerical risk criteria is concerned\, it is not always correct and thus the demonstration of ALARP and the usage of risk criteria should be justified based on the categorization of risk which may be either qualitative\, semi-quantitative\, or quantitative. \nMany countries regulate Major Hazard sites using a safety case regime based on a risk-based approach to process safety; Singapore is rolling out such a regime as mentioned. These regimes require that risk is controlled to ALARP (As Low AS Reasonably Practicable) level which is a very different approach to safety management than the compliance approach that many operators are familiar with. This course covers the important principles of ALARP\, which is a commonly misunderstood concept. It discusses the variability of ALARP requirements for managing similar hazards in different circumstances and the application of risk targets. It looks at different ways of assessing risk from quantified approaches to qualitative approaches for both consequence and frequency analysis and when\nto use these. The application of inherent safety principles and recognised good practice are discussed along with Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) and the concepts of reasonably practicable and disproportionality. Besides demonstrating ALARP in the safety case\, ALARP should be applied throughout the lifecycle of any facility. \nThis workshop will touch on how to apply the concept in different situations such as during design\, specifying instrumented safety systems\, operating procedures\, and coverage during maintenance of safety critical equipment. Several case studies are presented for the delegates to work through and a discussion on common errors and how the concept is often misused. Throughout this workshop\, participants will be taught on how to prove that ALARP has been properly implemented as part of effective risk management and how ALARP is implemented in the design\, development\, and operation of engineering systems. \nWho Should Attend\n\nEngineers\, Executives\, Supervisors and Managers especially those who work in Technical & Planning\, Production/Operation\, Engineering\, and SHE departments in Refinery\, Chemicals\, and Petrochemical settings will benefit by attending this course.\nPotential attendees are listed out as follows:\nProcess Engineer\nProcess Champion\nEHS Engineer\nProduction Engineer/Supervisor\nMaintenance Engineer\nOperations Engineer\nMechanical Engineer\nProduction Manager\nTechnical Manager\nTechnical Development Manager\n\nKey Learning Points\n\nLEARN the essential principles of ALARP and how it fits within a Safety Case\nGAIN the key concepts of ALARP principles and the fundamental approaches for its applications\nKNOW the HSE principles for Cost Benefit Analyses (CBA) in support of ALARP decisions\nUNDERSTAND the approaches to good practice and to demonstrate ALARP using different decision making criteria\nACQUIRE tools and techniques to determine factors in selecting or rejecting control measures\nWith each process deviation\, APPLY the concept of ALARP (As Low as Reasonably Practicable) or risk elimination on the causes and consequences\nBECOME familiar with PHA study\, its context in WSH Act and its relation in Safety Case regime\nExercise CAUTION in regards to reverse ALARP whereby CBA or QRA is used to justify higher risk\n\nEnquiry Form\n\n \n \n SalutationMr.Miss.Mrs.Mdm.Dr.Prof.Capt.Name\n \n \n \n First\n \n \n \n \n Last\n \n \n PhoneEmail\n \n CompanyAdditional Comments:CAPTCHA URL:https://www.opuskinetic.com/training/alarp-principles-guidelines-7/ LOCATION:Kuala Lumpur\, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur\, Kuala Lumpur\, Malaysia CATEGORIES:Corporate, Business Management and HR,Oil/Gas/Petrochemicals GEO:3.1384965;101.7099933 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR